To Kindle or Not to Kindle

I'm lukewarm at best to the idea of ebooks and electronic readers.  There is, for me, something romantic and almost magical about a real book.  There's an excitement in our house when the kids come home from the library with their bags of books.  I just don't see that happening with an e-reader.

My friend Chris has been flirting with the Kindle (see posts here, here and here), but has not yet committed to the relationship (I don't know if is courtship with his wife took this long).

Here's one reason why he may want to hold off consummating his Kindle relationship:
...the Kindle locks you down with more rules than the Army Field Manual. The Kindle won't let you resell or share your books. Anything you buy through the reader is fixed to your Amazon account, readable only on the Kindle or other devices that Amazon may one day deem appropriate. (The company has hinted that it'll build an iPhone app that can read Kindle books.) Even worse, you can buy books for your Kindle only from Amazon's store. Indeed, the device makes it difficult to read anything that's not somehow routed through Amazon first—you can surf the Web on the Kindle, and you can convert some of your personal Microsoft Word or text files to the device's format, but doing so is slow and not very reliable. In order to read blogs, magazines, newspapers, and books, you've really got to go through Amazon's store first.

You can see where this is going: Kindle owners buy a lot of stuff, and the more stuff they buy, the more likely they are to stick with the Kindle in the future, even when/if someone else invents a better, more open e-book service. This restriction makes Amazon the prime market for book publishers. How can they resist giving over their entire catalog to a store that attracts so many eager, captive shoppers? Publishers' acquiescence in turn increases the Kindle's appeal to new buyers. If you're in the market for an e-book reader, you'll probably choose the one that offers the most books, and that means Kindle. (At the moment, there are about 240,000 titles available for the Kindle; the Sony Reader, its closest rival, has fewer than 100,000.) Taken together, these trends all point in one direction—Amazon will come to rule the market for e-books. And as the master of the e-book universe, Amazon will eventually call the shots on pricing, marketing, and everything else associated with the new medium.

I suppose if I choose to own an ereader, much like iPod forcing me to use iTunes, IE for poorly designed Web sites, and Zondervan for making me pay extra for the NIV translation for my Bible software, I will grudgingly cave in to the black hole of corporate dominance.

HT: Andrew Sullivan

 
Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 3/3/2009 8:28 AM Chris wrote:
    Actually, I was a head case in making the marriage decision thing. I tend to over-analyze as you have astutely noted.

    I have often relentlessly questioned our mutual friend Peter before making a decision about a purchase. Of course, he now owns a Mac, so I know you consider him apostate.

    Anyway --As I've said, I"m feeling the weight of carrying around so many books and/or inventorying them.

    I am still Kindle free though.
    1. 3/3/2009 8:42 AM jwanoj wrote:
      Actually, you have made the best case yet for a Kindle and that is from a study/research stand point.  It would be great if you could throw two or three commentaries on there, be able to search and bookmark key points.  I could see how students would appreciate being able to download textbooks at a significant savings to their pocketbooks and backpacks.

      What I can't seem to wrap my head around is the concept of "curling up with a good ebook", just doesn't have the same feel.

Leave a comment

Comments are closed.