City of God, City of Man
Pastor Brian wrote a great piece on politics and the Christian's responsiblity to government as it relates to 1 Peter. I agree in principal with everything he says, but I have been reflecting lately on what the Christian's expectation should be when it comes to politics and government.
Patrick Deenen points out Augustine's view regarding "the belief in perfectibility in this world" through politics and government.
Patrick Deenen points out Augustine's view regarding "the belief in perfectibility in this world" through politics and government.
Insisting upon the distinction between the City of God where the heart
can rest and salvation lies, and the City of Man, which is inescapably
marked by the stain of Original Sin and the inexpungable human lust for
dominion ("libido dominandi"), Augustine chided heretical
contemporaries against the belief in perfectibility in this world,
cautioned against the belief that salvation lie in our power to
achieve, and urged upon his contemporaries a realism and humility
regarding what is possible in the realm of politics. Most importantly,
Augustinian realism clarifies the distinction between "hope" and
"optimism," the former which is closely aligned to humility and modest
expectations for what is possible in the saeculum, the latter which
inclines toward over-confidence in the human power of transformation
and perfection. Hope resists ideology and overinvesting in the prospect
of political transformation; optimism either results in ideology
resistant to the hard data of reality with attendant abuses by
political elites, and ultimately elicits in optimism's close kin,
disappointment, cynicism and despair.

Comments